Scale
- Capped by our capacity, not your budget
- Dedicated publisher relationships
- Digital PR campaigns included
- White-label reporting
- Direct line to the person doing the work
Link acquisition for sites that plan to be around in three years.
Link building has a reputation problem, and mostly it earns it. The industry rewards speed, and speed rewards shortcuts. We took the opposite position: a slower pipeline, a smaller monthly ceiling, and a review step that occasionally kills a placement we have already paid for. It costs us margin and it keeps the results defensible.
Often, yes. It usually starts with an audit and an unhappy conversation, and the first phase is subtraction rather than addition.
Yes. Reports can go out unbranded or under your own, and we are used to being the party that never speaks to the end client.
The team is distributed across Europe, which is mostly why the outreach in Polish, Ukrainian, German and Spanish is done by people who actually speak those languages.
Placement and indexation are different problems. A link can be live and correct for weeks before a crawler gets to that page, particularly on smaller publishers. We report the live URL on the day it publishes so you are never waiting on a tool to tell you the work happened.
A profile audit on its own is worthwhile and plenty of people stop there. For placements, anything under a few months tends not to tell you much either way.
By placement, on the publisher, agreed before we start. There is no bulk discount for volume because volume is not what we are selling.
We have been doing this long enough to have made most of the available mistakes at our own expense. The process on this page is largely a list of things we now refuse to repeat.
We started as an in-house team doing this for one portfolio of sites, which is a useful way to learn the trade because you cannot hand the consequences to somebody else at the end of the quarter. When the process worked well enough that people started asking to borrow it, it became a service.
This began as an internal tool for a small group of site owners who were tired of buying links and then auditing them afterwards. Most of the rules on this page exist because at some point we broke one of them and had to clean up after ourselves.
If a placement did not happen, the report says which one and why. Campaigns that only ever report successes are hiding the interesting part.
Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.
Reports are written on the assumption that somebody sceptical will read them. Every placement carries the live URL, the anchor used, the target page, the publication date and a short note explaining why that publisher was on the list in the first place.
We keep a separate project going where the working notes and the longer write-ups live. It is less polished and rather more detailed:
Tell us what you have already tried and what it cost. It saves a discovery call and it tells us more than a brief usually does.